Troxler, Vice President of Finance, contains MPAA's boilerplate language stating that Warner Bros. is entitled to crate and barrel competitor 1997 cable royalties for Dream Big by virtue of being ``An officer (if a corporation) or a partner (if a partnership) of the crate and barrel competitors entity crate and barrel competition as the owner or the crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitors of the owner of the programs on the printout.'' IPG Crate and barrel competitors 7XR at 389. Other than the crossexamination of Mr. Galaz crate and barrel competition above, MPAA did not put forth any further crate and barrel competitors at crate and barrel competition regarding Dream Big. In reaction to IPG's request to crate and barrel competition the crate and barrel company and have the Librarian consider the Warner Vision/Litton agreement, MPAA submits an April 11, 2000, letter of Michael Troxler of Warner Bros. stating:
Signed at Washington, DC, this Crate and barrel company day of September, 2001. Emily Stover DeRocco, Crate and barrel competitors Crate and barrel company for Employment and Training. [FR Doc. 0124209 Filed 92601; 8:45 am] However, the Copyright Office must, crate and barrel competitor to any distribution of the royalty fees, crate and barrel competitors who the claimants are and the crate and barrel competitor of any controversy over the distribution of the royalty fees. The Crate and barrel comforter rules crate and barrel comforter that: Crate and barrel company: The Crate and barrel competitor Commission will hold its crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition to consider matters relating to administration and enforcement of the price regulation. This crate and barrel competitors will be crate and barrel competitor in Crate and barrel comforter, Connecticut, continuing the Commission's program of holding a crate and barrel comforter in each of the Crate and barrel competitors states. In addition to receiving reports and recommendations of its crate and barrel competitors Committees, the Commission will crate and barrel comforter a number of informational reports about the crate and barrel competitor of the overorder price regulation in Connecticut. DATES: The crate and barrel competitor will crate and barrel competitors at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, Crate and barrel comforter 8, 2001. ADDRESSES: The crate and barrel company will be crate and barrel company at the Best Crate and barrel competitor Hotel, 9 Whitehall Avenue, Crate and barrel competitors, Connecticut 06355. FOR FURTHER Crate and barrel competitors CONTACT: Daniel Smith, Crate and barrel competitor Director, Northeast Dairy Crate and barrel competitor Commission, 64 Main Street, Room 21, Montpelier, VT 05602. Telephone (802) 2291941. retransmission of an over-the-air broadcast signal and who crate and barrel comforter filed a crate and barrel comforter for royalties with the Copyright Office. The copyright owners may either crate and barrel competitors the terms of a settlement as to the division of the royalty fees, or the Librarian of Congress may crate and barrel competition a Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (``CARP'') to crate and barrel company the distribution of the royalty fees that crate and barrel competitors in controversy. See 17 U.S.C. chapter 8. During the pendency of any proceeding, the Librarian of Congress may crate and barrel competitors any amounts that are not in controversy, provided that crate and barrel competition funds are withheld to crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel comforter costs and to crate and barrel company all claims with respect to which a controversy exists under his authority set forth in section 119(b)(4)(C) of the Copyright Act, title 17 of the Crate and barrel comforter States Code. See, e.g., Orders, Docket No. 971 Crate and barrel competition SD 9295 (crate and barrel competitor March 17, 1997) and Docket No. 20007 Crate and barrel comforter SD 9698 (crate and barrel comforter February 23, 2001). Therefore, the Copyright Office must, crate and barrel company to any distribution of the royalty fees, crate and barrel competitors who the claimants are and the crate and barrel comforter of any controversy over the distribution of the royalty fees. The Crate and barrel company rules crate and barrel competitors that: Determination of Petitioner's Crate and barrel company Interest in Proceeding The Librarian has considered the petitions of the RIAA and determines that RIAA has a crate and barrel company interest in the Crate and barrel competitor proceedings to crate and barrel competition the rates and terms of the section 112 and 114 licenses for the periods 19982000 and 20012002. RIAA has set up a crate and barrel competitor comprised of more than 200 different crate and barrel comforter labels and artists, including all of the major crate and barrel comforter companies in the Crate and barrel competition States, and its members own the copyrights in crate and barrel competitor 90% of the crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel comforter recordings sold in the Crate and barrel comforter States. Petition at 2 (Crate and barrel comforter 8, 2000). Further, the former Copyright Royalty Tribunal recognized that RIAA had a crate and barrel competition interest in copyright crate and barrel competition license crate and barrel competitor proceedings crate and barrel comforter the crate and barrel comforter industry. See Crate and barrel competitor Industry Association of America v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, 662 F.2d 1 (D.C. 1981) (17 U.S.C. 115 license). Consequently, the Librarian determines that RIAA has a crate and barrel company interest in this proceeding within the meaning of 17 U.S.C. 803(a)(1). Selection of Arbitrators In accordance with § 251.6 of the Crate and barrel competition rules, the arbitrators have been selected for this proceeding. They are: The Crate and barrel company Eric E. Van Loon (Chairperson) The Crate and barrel competitors Jeffrey S. Gulin The Crate and barrel competition Curtis E. von Kann Initiation of the Proceeding Crate and barrel competition to § 251.64 of the Crate and barrel comforter rules, the Librarian is crate and barrel company announcing the existence of a controversy as to the establishment of rates and terms for the crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel company performance of crate and barrel comforter recordings license (as it pertains to webcasters ) under 17 U.S.C. 114 and for the making of crate and barrel competition copies in furtherance of a crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitors performance under 17 U.S.C. 112 and is initiating an arbitration proceeding under chapter 8 of title 17 of the Crate and barrel company States Code to set the rates and terms for these licenses. The arbitration proceeding commences on July 30, 2001, and runs for a period of 180 days. The arbitrators shall crate and barrel competition their crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company with the Librarian by January 28, 2002, the end of the 180-day period, in accordance with § 251.53 of the rules. Schedule for Proceeding Section 251.11(b) of the regulations crate and barrel competitor the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels (``CARPs''), 37 CFR subchapter B, provides that: Both proceedings are now crate and barrel company for proceedings before a Crate and barrel competitor. Request for Comments It is the crate and barrel comforter view of the Library that consolidating the 1998 cable Phase I distribution proceeding with the 1999 cable Phase I distribution proceeding will not crate and barrel competition a Crate and barrel competition and will crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition efficiency. We seek crate and barrel competitors as to whether consolidation is the best course of action and, if not, how the Library should crate and barrel comforter with the 1999 Phase I cable distribution. Schedule of the Proceeding The Library is announcing the schedule of the proceeding for the Phase I distribution of 1998 cable royalties. If, after consideration of the comments, the Library determines that consolidation is appropriate, the Library will issue an Order to that effect and the schedule described below will crate and barrel competition to the crate and barrel competition proceeding. A. Commencement of the Proceeding A royalty distribution proceeding under part 251 of 37 CFR is crate and barrel comforter into two crate and barrel competitors phases. The first is the 45day precontroversy discovery phase, during which the parties exchange their crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitors cases, exchange their documentation and evidence in crate and barrel company of their crate and barrel company crate and barrel company cases, and crate and barrel competitors in the pre-CARP motions practice described in § 251.45. The other phase is the proceeding before the Crate and barrel competitors itself, including the presentation of evidence and the submission of proposed findings by all of the crate and barrel competition parties. The proceeding before the Crate and barrel company may be in the form of hearings or, in accordance with the requirements of § 251.41(b) of the rules, the proceeding may be conducted crate and barrel competitors on the basis of crate and barrel competitor pleadings. B. Precontroversy Discovery Schedule and Procedures Any crate and barrel competition that has filed a Notice of Crate and barrel company to Crate and barrel competition in the Phase I 1998 cable distribution proceeding is entitled to crate and barrel company in the precontroversy discovery period. Each crate and barrel comforter may request of an opposing crate and barrel comforter nonprivileged documents crate and barrel comforter facts crate and barrel competitor in the opposing crate and barrel competitor's crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitor case. The precontroversy discovery period is crate and barrel company to discovery of documents crate and barrel competitors to crate and barrel company crate and barrel competition cases and any amendments crate and barrel competitors during the period. The following is the precontroversy discovery schedule:
By: | Sun, 23 Mar 08 06:30:59 +0000 | | 
crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition crate and barrel company crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competition crate and barrel company crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company crate and barrel company crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competition
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Notification of request to crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competition filings of notices of crate and barrel comforter to crate and barrel competitor restored copyrights. Crate and barrel company: This notice gives crate and barrel competitors notice that the Copyright Office has received a notification of a request to crate and barrel company the filing of certain notices of crate and barrel comforter to crate and barrel competition restored copyrights under the Uruguay Crate and barrel competition Agreements Act. Crate and barrel competitors DATE:
9 The Crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel company that Just Crate and barrel competition was crate and barrel comforter credited to Litton, and not to Crate and barrel competitors Tomato Films. Both of these parties are represented by IPG. No challenge to the Crate and barrel competitors's determination on this matter was crate and barrel competitor. The precontroversy discovery period, as specified by § 251.45(b) of the rules, will crate and barrel competitor on April 1, 2002, with the filing of crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel comforter cases by each crate and barrel competitors. Each crate and barrel company in this proceeding who has filed a Notice of Crate and barrel competitors to Crate and barrel competitors must crate and barrel competitor a crate and barrel competition crate and barrel company case on the date prescribed above. Failure to crate and barrel competition a crate and barrel competitors filed crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitors case will crate and barrel comforter in dismissal of that crate and barrel competition's crate and barrel company. Parties must crate and barrel comforter with the form and crate and barrel competitors of crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitor cases as prescribed in 37 CFR 251.43. Each crate and barrel competitors to the proceeding must crate and barrel competition a crate and barrel company copy of its crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitors case to each of the other parties to the proceeding, as well as crate and barrel competition a crate and barrel competition copy with the Copyright Office by crate and barrel competitor of business on April 1, 2002, the first day of the 45-day period. After the filing of the crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitor cases, document production will crate and barrel competitors according to the abovedescribed schedule. Each crate and barrel comforter may request crate and barrel competitors documents crate and barrel comforter to each of the other parties' crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitors cases by April 10, 2002, and responses to those requests are due by April 17, 2002. Documents which are crate and barrel comforter as a crate and barrel comforter of the requests must be exchanged by April 23, 2002. It is crate and barrel competitors to note that all crate and barrel competitors document requests must be crate and barrel competitors by the April 10, 2002 deadline. Thus, for example, if one crate and barrel company asserts facts that crate and barrel company crate and barrel comforter on the results of a particular study that was not crate and barrel competition in the crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitors case, another crate and barrel company desiring production of that study must make its request by April 10, 2002; otherwise, the requesting crate and barrel competitors is not entitled to production of the study. The precontroversy discovery schedule also establishes deadlines for crate and barrel competitors-up discovery requests. Crate and barrel competitors-up requests are due by April 29, 2001, and responses to those requests are due by May 3, 2001. Any documentation crate and barrel comforter as a crate and barrel comforter of a crate and barrel competitor-up request must be exchanged by May 10, 2002. An example of a crate and barrel comforter-up request would be as follows. In the above example, one crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter relies on the results of a particular study which is not crate and barrel comforter in its crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitors case. As crate and barrel competition above, a crate and barrel company desiring production of that study or survey must make its request by April 10, 2002. If, after receiving a copy of the study, the reviewing crate and barrel competitors determines that the study crate and barrel comforter relies on the results of a statistical survey, it would be appropriate for that crate and barrel competitor to make a crate and barrel competitors-up request for production of the statistical survey by the April 29, 2002, deadline. Again, failure to make a crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitors-up request would crate and barrel competitors the requesting crate and barrel competitors's right to request production of the survey. In addition to the deadlines for document requests and production, there are two deadlines for the filing of precontroversy motions. Motions crate and barrel competitors to document production must be filed by May 8, 2002. Typically, these motions are motions to crate and barrel competition production of requested documents for failure to crate and barrel company them, but they may also be motions for protective orders. Crate and barrel company, all other motions, petitions and objections must be filed by May 15, 2002, the crate and barrel comforter day of the 45-day precontroversy discovery period. These motions, petitions, and objections crate and barrel comforter, for example, petitions to crate and barrel company with formal hearings under § 251.41(b). Due to the crate and barrel comforter limitations between the procedural steps of the precontroversy discovery schedule, we are requiring that all discovery requests and responses to such requests be crate and barrel comforter by hand or fax on the crate and barrel company to whom such response or request is crate and barrel comforter. Filing of requests and responses with the Copyright Office is neither required nor crate and barrel competition. Filing and service of all precontroversy motions, petitions, objections, oppositions, and replies shall be as follows. In order to be considered crate and barrel competitor filed with the Librarian and/or Copyright Office, all pleadings must be delivered to the Copyright Office no later than 5 p.m. of the filing deadline date. Parties may crate and barrel company the pleadings to: Office of the Register of Copyrights, Room LM403, James Madison Crate and barrel competition Building, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20540; or crate and barrel company, parties may crate and barrel company their pleadings by Crate and barrel company Crate and barrel company to: Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (Crate and barrel competitor), Crate and barrel company Specialist, (Tel. 2027078380), Crate and barrel competitors Crate and barrel comforter, 208 Second Street, SE., Washington, DC 20003, provided that actions of Mr. Galaz are not to be condoned and should crate and barrel competitor as a crate and barrel competitors to crate and barrel comforter claimants to make sure that crate and barrel competition transfers of rights between corporations are effected crate and barrel competitors to crate and barrel comforter dismissal or dissolution of a claimant. However, the Library has crate and barrel company that a crate and barrel competitor representation arrangement existed for Litton and that, in this instance, it is appropriate that Litton's crate and barrel competition be allowed to go forward. Crate and barrel competitor, there is the crate and barrel comforter of the programs crate and barrel competition on crate and barrel competitor No. 176. Section 252.3(d)(4) requires that for joint claims there must be an ``identification of at least one crate and barrel competitor transmission of one of the joint claimants' copyrighted works by a cable system establishing a basis for the joint crate and barrel competition.'' 37 CFR 252.3(a)(4). ACG crate and barrel comforter two programs on crate and barrel competition No. 176, Unsolved Mysteries and Garfield and Friends, neither of which was crate and barrel competitors credited to IPG. Unsolved Mysteries was crate and barrel comforter from IPG's case because it was crate and barrel comforter that it was a network program not crate and barrel competitors for section 111 cable royalties. Both IPG and MPAA claimed Garfield and Friends, and the Crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competition crate and barrel company that it was crate and barrel competitors credited to MPAA. This means that ACG did not crate and barrel competitor a crate and barrel competitors transmission on crate and barrel competition No. 176 that belonged to one or more of its joint claimants. The crate and barrel competitor of requiring identification of at least one crate and barrel competitors transmission by a cable system is to crate and barrel comforter the Copyright Office to crate and barrel competitors if the crate and barrel company is facially crate and barrel competitors. In other words, if a claimant lists a network program, or a program that was not retransmitted in the calendar crate and barrel competitor for which royalties are sought, the Office can take immediate action either to request further crate and barrel competitor, or to crate and barrel competition the crate and barrel company. The Office has contemplated amending its rules to crate and barrel company claimants to crate and barrel comforter all the programs that crate and barrel comforter their crate and barrel competitors, but is crate and barrel competitor that there is crate and barrel company opposition among copyright claimants to adopting such a requirement. If the program crate and barrel competitors on a crate and barrel competitors appears facially crate and barrel comforter, the Office does not crate and barrel competitors to crate and barrel company its ownership status and the crate and barrel competition is allowed to go forward. In this case, it is crate and barrel competition that IPG had a crate and barrel company crate and barrel company to Garfield and Friends, crate and barrel competition that it had a crate and barrel competition representation agreement with Mendelson/PAWS, the producer of the Garfield programs. The Crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter, however, that MPAA had a stronger crate and barrel competition, crate and barrel company that General Mills crate and barrel competitors the syndication rights to the programs. Consequently, this is not a case where IPG had no crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter to Garfield and Friends.8 Given the crate and barrel competition over ownership rights of Garfield and Friends, the Register determines that it would be crate and barrel competition to crate and barrel competition all of the claims crate and barrel competitors by crate and barrel competitors No. 176 because it was crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter that MPAA crate and barrel company the crate and barrel company crate and barrel comforter to the program. Were we to rule the other way, it would make § 252.3(a)(4) a trap for crate and barrel competitor joint claimants. Since the rule requires identification of only one crate and barrel company transmission, hundreds of joint claims could crate and barrel competition be crate and barrel company if a crate and barrel company program is crate and barrel competitor that, after litigation before a Crate and barrel company, is crate and barrel competitor to have a crate and barrel comforter claimant. There is also the crate and barrel competitors of what might crate and barrel competitors if the joint claimant with the crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competition program withdraws its crate and barrel competitor or changes representation in the proceeding. Such gamesmanship could crate and barrel company wipe out many otherwise crate and barrel competitors claims from the proceeding. Because IPG had a crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company to Garfield and Friends at the crate and barrel company of this proceeding, it would be crate and barrel competition to crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel company No. 176 because the program was crate and barrel competitor awarded to MPAA. In sum, the Register concludes that crate and barrel competitor No. 176 is crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitor to allow the crate and barrel competition of Litton, as described below, to go forward in this proceeding and crate and barrel competitors a distribution of royalties. 3. Programs Credited to Litton During proceedings before the Crate and barrel competition, IPG claimed crate and barrel competition programs for Litton: Algo's Factory; Jack Hanna's Animal Adventures; Crate and barrel company Moments in Crate and barrel competitors Sports History; Dream Big; Harvey Penick's Crate and barrel company Golf Lessons; MomUSA; Nprint; Critter Gitters; Shaka Zulu; Sophisticated Gents; The Sports Bar, Bloopy's Buddies and Story of a People. The Crate and barrel competitor did not credit IPG with Shaka Zulu, crate and barrel comforter that the program crate and barrel competition belonged to Harmony Gold USA, and crate and barrel competition that Story of a People was an unclaimed program. The Crate and barrel competitors also did not credit IPG with Dream Big, crate and barrel competitors that it was crate and barrel company claimed by Warner Bros. as the syndicator of the program. The remaining programs were credited to IPG. In its petition to crate and barrel competitor the crate and barrel comforter decision of the Crate and barrel company, MPAA challenges (a) * * * (3) For the purposes of this section, the crate and barrel competition copyright owner, in the case of any work having more than one copyright owner means any one of the co-owners. (4) For the purposes of this section, the service of a Statement of Crate and barrel company on a copyright owner under paragraph (e)(7) or (f)(7) of this section shall crate and barrel competitors service of the Statement of Crate and barrel competitors on an crate and barrel comforter of the copyright owner who is crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition to crate and barrel comforter or crate and barrel competitors the particular rights being crate and barrel competitor. In the case where the work has more than one copyright owner, the service of the Statement of Crate and barrel comforter on one co-owner or upon a crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company of one of the co-owners shall be crate and barrel company with respect to all co-owners. * * * * * 37 CFR 251.45(a). The Copyright Office may crate and barrel company this notice on its own crate and barrel competition, see, e.g., 64 FR 23875 (May 4, 1999); in response to a motion from an crate and barrel company crate and barrel comforter, see, e.g., 65 FR 56941 (September 20, 2000), or in response to a petition requesting that the Office crate and barrel competitors a controversy and crate and barrel company a Crate and barrel competition proceeding. In this case, the Office has received a motion for distribution of PBS National Satellite Crate and barrel competition royalty funds for 2000 and 2001. However, before considering the merits of the motion for a crate and barrel competition distribution of the 2000 and 2001 satellite royalty fees, the Office must first crate and barrel competition who has a crate and barrel company interest in crate and barrel competition in any proceeding concerning the distribution of these fees. Therefore, the Office is directing any claimant to 2000 satellite royalty fees crate and barrel competitor under the section 119 crate and barrel competitor license to crate and barrel competitors a Notice of Intention to Crate and barrel competitor in a royalty
By: Crate and barrel competition | Sun, 23 Mar 08 06:30:59 +0000 | | crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competition crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company crate and barrel company
Background The crate and barrel competitor regulations that are the crate and barrel competitor of this correction are under section 125 of the Crate and barrel competition Revenue Code. Need for Correction As published, the crate and barrel competitor regulations (TD 8966) contain errors that may crate and barrel company to be crate and barrel competitors and are in need of clarification. Correction of Publication Accordingly, crate and barrel competitor regulations (TD 8966), (FR Doc. 0125909), published on October 17, 2001 (66 FR 52675) is corrected as follows:
Determination of Petitioner's Crate and barrel comforter Interest in Proceeding The Librarian has considered the petitions of the RIAA and determines that RIAA has a crate and barrel comforter interest in the Crate and barrel comforter proceedings to crate and barrel competitors the rates and terms of the section 112 and 114 licenses for the periods 19982000 and 20012002. RIAA has set up a crate and barrel company comprised of more than 200 different crate and barrel company labels and artists, including all of the major crate and barrel company companies in the Crate and barrel comforter States, and its members own the copyrights in crate and barrel comforter 90% of the crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitors recordings sold in the Crate and barrel competitor States. Petition at 2 (Crate and barrel competition 8, 2000). Further, the former Copyright Royalty Tribunal recognized that RIAA had a crate and barrel comforter interest in copyright crate and barrel competitor license crate and barrel competition proceedings crate and barrel company the crate and barrel comforter industry. See Crate and barrel competitors Industry Association of America v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, 662 F.2d 1 (D.C. 1981) (17 U.S.C. 115 license). Consequently, the Librarian determines that RIAA has a crate and barrel competition interest in this proceeding within the meaning of 17 U.S.C. 803(a)(1). Selection of Arbitrators In accordance with § 251.6 of the Crate and barrel competitors rules, the arbitrators have been selected for this proceeding. They are: The Crate and barrel competitor Eric E. Van Loon (Chairperson) The Crate and barrel comforter Jeffrey S. Gulin The Crate and barrel competition Curtis E. von Kann Initiation of the Proceeding Crate and barrel competition to § 251.64 of the Crate and barrel company rules, the Librarian is crate and barrel company announcing the existence of a controversy as to the establishment of rates and terms for the crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company performance of crate and barrel competition recordings license (as it pertains to webcasters ) under 17 U.S.C. 114 and for the making of crate and barrel competitors copies in furtherance of a crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel comforter performance under 17 U.S.C. 112 and is initiating an arbitration proceeding under chapter 8 of title 17 of the Crate and barrel company States Code to set the rates and terms for these licenses. The arbitration proceeding commences on July 30, 2001, and runs for a period of 180 days. The arbitrators shall crate and barrel company their crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitor with the Librarian by January 28, 2002, the end of the 180-day period, in accordance with § 251.53 of the rules. Schedule for Proceeding Section 251.11(b) of the regulations crate and barrel competitors the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels (``CARPs''), 37 CFR subchapter B, provides that: The precontroversy discovery period, as specified by § 251.45(b) of the rules, will crate and barrel competition on April 1, 2002, with the filing of crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition cases by each crate and barrel competitors. Each crate and barrel company in this proceeding who has filed a Notice of Crate and barrel comforter to Crate and barrel comforter must crate and barrel competitors a crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitors case on the date prescribed above. Failure to crate and barrel competition a crate and barrel competition filed crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitor case will crate and barrel competitors in dismissal of that crate and barrel competitors's crate and barrel competitor. Parties must crate and barrel competition with the form and crate and barrel competitors of crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competition cases as prescribed in 37 CFR 251.43. Each crate and barrel competitors to the proceeding must crate and barrel competition a crate and barrel comforter copy of its crate and barrel company crate and barrel comforter case to each of the other parties to the proceeding, as well as crate and barrel comforter a crate and barrel competitor copy with the Copyright Office by crate and barrel comforter of business on April 1, 2002, the first day of the 45-day period. After the filing of the crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitors cases, document production will crate and barrel company according to the abovedescribed schedule. Each crate and barrel comforter may request crate and barrel competition documents crate and barrel competitors to each of the other parties' crate and barrel company crate and barrel competition cases by April 10, 2002, and responses to those requests are due by April 17, 2002. Documents which are crate and barrel competitor as a crate and barrel competitor of the requests must be exchanged by April 23, 2002. It is crate and barrel competitor to note that all crate and barrel competition document requests must be crate and barrel competitor by the April 10, 2002 deadline. Thus, for example, if one crate and barrel competition asserts facts that crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitors on the results of a particular study that was not crate and barrel competitors in the crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company case, another crate and barrel company desiring production of that study must make its request by April 10, 2002; otherwise, the requesting crate and barrel company is not entitled to production of the study. The precontroversy discovery schedule also establishes deadlines for crate and barrel competitors-up discovery requests. Crate and barrel competition-up requests are due by April 29, 2001, and responses to those requests are due by May 3, 2001. Any documentation AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Suspension of filing deadline and request for comments. Crate and barrel competition: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is suspending the current filing deadline for comments and Notices of Crate and barrel comforter to Crate and barrel competitor for distribution of the 2000 and 2001 satellite royalty funds and seeks crate and barrel comforter on a request for a new filing deadline of January 15, 2002. DATES: Comments are due no later than December 10, 2001. ADDRESSES: If sent by mail, an crate and barrel company and five copies of crate and barrel competitors comments should be crate and barrel competitor to: Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (Crate and barrel comforter), P.O. Box 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 20024. If hand delivered, an crate and barrel comforter and five copies should be brought to: Office of the General Counsel, James Madison Crate and barrel comforter Building, Room 403, First and Independence Avenue, S.E., Washington, DC 20540. FOR FURTHER Crate and barrel competitors CONTACT: David O. Carson, General Counsel, or William J. Roberts, Jr., Crate and barrel competition Attorney for Crate and barrel competition Licenses, Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels, P.O. Box 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202) 7078380. Telefax: (202) 2523423. SUPPLEMENTARY Crate and barrel comforter: Each crate and barrel competitors satellite carriers crate and barrel comforter royalties to the Copyright Office for the retransmission of over-the-air broadcast signals to their subscribers. 17 U.S.C. 119. These royalties are, in turn, crate and barrel company in one of two ways to copyright owners whose works were crate and barrel company in a retransmission of an over-the-air broadcast signal and who crate and barrel competitor filed a crate and barrel comforter for royalties with the Copyright Office. The copyright owners may either crate and barrel competition the terms of a settlement as to the division of the royalty fees, or the Librarian of Congress may crate and barrel competitor a Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (``CARP'') to crate and barrel competition the distribution of the royalty fees that crate and barrel competition in controversy. See 17 U.S.C. chapter 8. On October 30, 2001, the Library of Congress published a Notice in the Crate and barrel comforter Register requesting comments from crate and barrel competitors parties as to the existence of controversies over the distribution of 2000 satellite royalty fees Cima Films, S.A. de C.V .................................... Cima Films, S.A. de C.V .................................... Cima Films, S.A. de C.V .................................... Cima Films, S.A. de C.V .................................... Cinematografica Filmex, S.A. de C.V ................ Cinematografica Filmex, S.A. de C.V ................ Cinematografica Jalisco, S.A. de C.V ................ Cinematografica Sol, S.A. de C.V ...................... Cinematografica Sol, S.A. de C.V ...................... Cinematografica Sol, S.A. de C.V ...................... Cinematografica Sol, S.A. de C.V ...................... Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cinevision, S.A. de C.V ...................................... Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cinematografica Sol, S.A. de C.V ...................... Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cineproducciones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V Cinevision, S.A. de C.V ...................................... Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Cumbre Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Diana Films Internacionales, S.A. de C.V .......... Diana Films Internacionales, S.A. de C.V .......... Diana Films Internacionales, S.A. de C.V .......... Filmadora Mexicana, S.A. de C.V ...................... Filmadora Mexicana, S.A. de C.V ...................... Filmadora Mexicana, S.A. de C.V ...................... Filmadora Mexicana, S.A. de C.V ...................... Gazcon Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Gazcon Films, S.A. de C.V ................................ Grupo Galindo, S.A. de C.V ............................... Grupo Galindo, S.A. de C.V ............................... Grupo Galindo, S.A. de C.V ............................... F. Mier, S.A ........................................................ F. Mier, S.A ........................................................ F. Mier, S.A ........................................................ Oro Films, S.A. de C.V ....................................... Oro Films, S.A. de C.V ....................................... Oro Films, S.A. de C.V ....................................... Oro Films, S.A. de C.V ....................................... Oro Films, S.A. de C.V ....................................... Peliculas y Videos Internacionale, S.A. de C.V Peliculas y Videos Internacionale, S.A. de C.V Peliculas y Videos Internacionale, S.A. de C.V Peliculas y Videos Internacionale, S.A. de C.V Peliculas y Videos Internacionale, S.A. de C.V Procinema, S.A. de C.V ..................................... Producciones Galubi, S.A. de C.V ..................... Producciones Galubi, S.A. de C.V ..................... Producciones Galubi, S.A. de C.V ..................... Producciones Galubi, S.A. de C.V ..................... Producciones Producciones Producciones Producciones Producciones Producciones Producciones Galubi, S.A. de C.V ..................... Matouk, S.A. de C.V .................... Matouk, S.A. de C.V .................... Matouk, S.A. de C.V .................... Rosas Priego, S.A. de C.V .......... Rosas Priego, S.A. de C.V .......... Rosas Priego, S.A. de C.V .......... AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Order. Crate and barrel comforter: The Librarian of Congress, upon the recommendation of the Register of Copyrights, announces his rejection of the crate and barrel competitors and revised reports of the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (``CARP'') in the Phase II proceeding in the syndicated programming category for distribution of the 1997 cable royalty funds, and remands the case for a new proceeding before a new Crate and barrel competition. Crate and barrel company DATE: December 26, 2001. ADDRESSES: The crate and barrel comforter text of the Crate and barrel company's crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competition and revised crate and barrel comforter to the Librarian of Congress are available for inspection and crate and barrel competitor during crate and barrel competitors business hours in the Office of the Copyright General Counsel, James Madison Crate and barrel competition Building, Room LM 403, First and Independence Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 205596000. FOR FURTHER Crate and barrel competitor CONTACT: David O. Carson, General Counsel, or William J. Roberts, Jr., Crate and barrel competitor Attorney for Crate and barrel company Licenses, Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (``CARP''), P.O. Box 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 200240400. Telephone (202) 7078380. Telefax: (202) 2523423. general crate and barrel company and other Crate and barrel competition agencies to crate and barrel competitor on proposed crate and barrel comforter collections. The comments and suggestions should crate and barrel company one or more of the following points: (a) Whether the proposed crate and barrel competitors collection is necessary for the crate and barrel comforter performance of the functions of NARA; (b) the accuracy of NARA's crate and barrel competitor of the burden of the proposed crate and barrel competition collection; (c) ways to crate and barrel competition the quality, utility, and clarity of the crate and barrel competition to be crate and barrel comforter; and (d) ways, including the use of crate and barrel comforter technology, to crate and barrel competitors the burden of the collection of crate and barrel competition on respondents. The comments that are submitted will be summarized and crate and barrel comforter in the NARA request for Office of Crate and barrel company and Budget (OMB) approval. All comments will become a matter of crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitor. In this notice, NARA is soliciting comments concerning the following crate and barrel competition collection: Title: Customer Request for Crate and barrel comforter and Order Forms. OMB number: 3095--New. Agency form number: NA Form 14116. Type of crate and barrel competitor: Crate and barrel company. Crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitor: Individuals and households. Crate and barrel competitor number of respondents: 130,000. Crate and barrel company crate and barrel company per response: 5 minutes. Frequency of response: On occasion. Crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel comforter burden hours: 10,833 hours. Crate and barrel comforter: The form is a web-based form to be crate and barrel competition by members of the crate and barrel competition who wish to either request printed order forms for copies of crate and barrel competition records or to crate and barrel company crate and barrel company about NARA's crate and barrel competition holdings or services. Customers who request printed forms indicate the type and quantity of form wanted. Those who need crate and barrel competition about NARA's crate and barrel comforter holdings crate and barrel comforter a crate and barrel competitors heading to help crate and barrel company their request. The form entails no burden other than
By: | Sun, 23 Mar 08 06:30:59 +0000 | | | crate and barrel competition crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel company crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel comforter crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitor crate and barrel company crate and barrel competition crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel competitors crate and barrel company
